Aerodynamics of Balsa Wood Gliders

Exploring the relationship between design and flight performance

Physics Investigatory Project 2025-26

Yashsvi Chavda Class 12-A

Project Overview

This experimental study investigates how design parameters like wing shape, dihedral angle, and center of gravity affect the flight characteristics of balsa wood gliders.

Preface

This project examines the four forces of flight—lift, drag, weight, and thrust—through the construction and testing of balsa wood gliders with varying design parameters.

The primary objective is to determine how specific design elements influence flight performance metrics including distance traveled and time aloft.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to:

  • Priti Ma'am (Physics Teacher)
  • Nilesh Sir & Sanjay Sir (Lab Teachers)
  • My parents for their support

Hypothesis & Research

Hypotheses
Wing Shape

Tapered wing designs will demonstrate longer flight distance and duration compared to rectangular wings.

Dihedral Angle

Increased dihedral angle will improve lateral stability and flight performance.

Center of Gravity

Optimal CG position near the wing's leading edge will enhance stability.

Aspect Ratio

Higher aspect ratio wings will exhibit improved aerodynamic efficiency.

Research Questions
  1. How does wing shape influence flight performance metrics?
  2. What dihedral angle provides optimal stability?
  3. How does CG position affect flight characteristics?
  4. What is the relationship between aspect ratio and efficiency?
  5. How do combined design parameters influence overall performance?

Theory & Principles

Four Forces of Flight

Lift

Upward force opposing weight, generated by wing airfoil

Weight

Downward gravitational force on the aircraft

Thrust

Forward propulsive force (absent in gliders)

Drag

Resistance opposing forward motion

Key Principles

Bernoulli's Principle

Pressure decreases as fluid velocity increases, creating lift through differential pressure above and below the wing.

Historical Context

Early Concepts

Leonardo da Vinci's studies of bird flight and early flying machine designs (15th-16th century)

18th Century

Newton's air resistance theory (1726) and Bernoulli's fluid dynamics principle (1738)

19th Century

George Cayley's identification of the four forces of flight and first wind tunnel by Francis Wenham (1871)

Modern Era

Wright Brothers' first powered flight (1903) leading to modern aerodynamics and CFD

Glide Angle & Efficiency

The glide angle determines flying efficiency, with smaller angles enabling longer flights per altitude loss.

sin(a) = h/s

tan(a) = h/d

Where h = height, s = distance to top, d = horizontal distance flown.

Experimental Design

Variables

Variable Implementation
Independent
Dihedral Angle
5 gliders with angles: 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 18°
Dependent
Airtime/Distance
Stopwatch (±0.01s) and tape measure
Controlled
Dimensions
Constant wing span and area across tests

Materials

  • Balsa wood sheets and sticks
  • Craft knives and sandpaper
  • Modeling clay for CG adjustment
  • Precision measurement tools

Procedure

Construction
  1. Prepare templates and cut components
  2. Shape wings with airfoil profile
  3. Set dihedral angles (0° to 18°)
  4. Assemble tail and attach to fuselage
  5. Adjust CG using modeling clay
Testing
  1. Build baseline and experimental gliders
  2. Perform initial trimming flights
  3. Conduct 5-10 trials per configuration
  4. Standardized hand launch procedure
  5. Record flight distance and time aloft

Results & Analysis

Key Findings

Performance

Gliders with 10-15° dihedral showed optimal performance:

  • 0°: 1.20s airtime, 4.8m distance
  • 5°: 1.65s airtime, 6.2m distance
  • 10°: 2.05s airtime, 7.8m distance
  • 15°: 2.11s airtime, 8.4m distance
  • 18°: 1.68s airtime, 6.7m distance

Performance peaked at 15° dihedral, then declined with further increase.

Data Summary

Measurements
Angle Airtime Distance
1.20 ± 0.11s 4.8 ± 0.3m
1.65 ± 0.15s 6.2 ± 0.4m
10° 2.05 ± 0.22s 7.8 ± 0.5m
15° 2.11 ± 0.38s 8.4 ± 0.6m
18° 1.68 ± 0.25s 6.7 ± 0.4m

Conclusions

Findings

  • 10-15° dihedral provides optimal stability
  • Excessive dihedral (>15°) reduces performance
  • Stable configuration improves flight metrics
  • Velocity remained constant across tests

Insights

  • Practical demonstration of aerodynamic principles
  • Importance of lateral stability in gliders
  • Trade-offs between stability and efficiency